|












|
 |
|
|
| |
Marine national park put on hold as SNP plans to
'sort out' sea laws
ALEX Salmond's SNP government is to shelve plans for
Scotland's first marine national park, The Scotsman
has learned.
Richard Lochhead, the minister for rural affairs,
said he did not believe that creating a coastal
national park was a priority and he had not been
persuaded there was enough support to justify it.
Mr Lochhead stressed that the national park plans
were not being ditched completely, and there was a
chance they might be resurrected in a few years, but
he made it clear that they would be put on hold for
the foreseeable future.
"Do we have a principled objection to a marine
national park? No. Do we believe that we should sort
out other legislation first? Yes. Are we convinced
there is demand for a new park? Not necessarily,"
the minister said.
Speaking in Glasgow after addressing fishing
industry leaders, Mr Lochhead described marine
regulations as a mess and said his first priority
was to devise a simpler and better framework for the
sea through a marine bill. Similar plans are being
worked up in London and Brussels.
He said: "Our priority at the moment is sorting out
the dog's breakfast that is marine legislation in
Scotland. We have a manifesto commitment and
cross-party support for a marine bill."
Mr Lochhead said this would co-ordinate the demands
of existing users, such as fishermen, with those of
new interest groups, such as organisations involved
in wave and tidal energy, sea tourism and the
environment.
The minister's announcement came as a shock to the
Scottish Greens, who have campaigned for years for a
marine national park and believed they were close to
achieving it.
It is the latest in a series of rifts between the
SNP and the Greens, who had hoped to form a
governing coalition after the election.
The Greens were angered by the SNP's decision to
scrap tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges and to
drive through with major transport projects.
Last night, Green MSP Robin Harper said: "I would be
very concerned if marine national parks in Scotland
are being shelved. I was instrumental in making sure
that the national parks legislation included the
possibility of setting up a marine national park,
and am concerned that after eight years we appear to
be still as far from this vision as we were in 1999.
"The previous executive took a top-down approach
which did not appeal to local communities. The SNP
has the opportunity to take a bottom-up
participative approach that would give our coastal
communities the chance to assess the immense
environmental, social and economic opportunities
they may be missing out on."
Other environmental organisations were more
sanguine, insisting that the priority was to have a
proper marine bill, rather than a single marine
national park.
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in
Scotland and WWF said their priority was protection
for the whole Scottish coast, rather than a national
park.
The previous Labour-led executive had driven forward
with the national park plans since 2005, putting
them out to consultation earlier this year.
An area on the Argyll and Wester Ross coast,
including the Argyll islands, the Small Isles and
the Ardnamurchan peninsula, had emerged as the
preferred option, although no decision had been
taken.
However, the Executive's consultation process had
revealed widespread opposition to the plans,
particularly from the fishing industry, aquaculture
interests and other business leaders, all of whom
were worried about the effect that a national park
would have on local economies.
As with its two terrestrial counterparts, the Loch
Lomond and the Trossachs and Cairngorms parks, the
aim of a marine park would be to enhance natural and
cultural heritage, as well as to promote the
sustainable use of natural resources. It was also
intended to improve visitors' understanding and
enjoyment of the area, and the sustainable
development of its communities.
Scottish Natural Heritage was one of the bodies
pushing hard for the marine national park to be
established but no-one from SNH was available for
comment last night.
|
 |
|
|
Last modified
Monday May 28, 2007
|